Tauhid Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39717 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- SIKTA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Tauhid Alam S/O Zamil Ahmad R/O Village - Jhumka, P.S- Sikta, Distt.- West Champaran 2.
Taukir Alam Son of Zamil Ahmad R/O Village - Jhumka, P.S- Sikta, Distt.- West Champaran 3.
Sabir Alam@ Shabbir Alam @ Fate Alam Son of Zamil Ahmad R/O Village - Jhumka, P.S- Sikta, Distt.- West Champaran 4.
Zamil Ahmad @ Mofuj Son of Late Mafuz Ahmad @ Mofizur Rahman @ Mofiz Shekh R/O Village - Jhumka, P.S- Sikta, Distt.- West Champaran 5.
Shami Ahmad @ Said Ahmad Son of Mafuz Ahmad @ Maphuj Rahman @ Late Mofirjurahaman @ Mofij Sheikh @ Mofuj Rahman R/O Village - Jhumka, P.S- Sikta, Distt.- West Champaran 6.
Kafil Ahmad Son of late Mofirjurahman @ Mafuz Ahmad @ Mofizur Rahman @ Mofiz Sheikh @ Maphuj Rahman R/O Village - Jhumka, P.SSikta, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 326(g) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on 18.03.2026, due to pre-existing dispute, all these accused-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39717 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 petitioners, set the house of informant on fire as a result of which the household articles and a Honda Shine motorcycle got burnt. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 5 have got one criminal antecedent each, Petitioner Nos. 3 and 6 have got two criminal antecedents each and Petitioner No. 4 has got five criminal antecedents.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and criminal antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T