← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16392/2017bail granted

Prakash Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-16Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16392 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2015 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Prakash Kumar Pandey Son of Ram Dinesh Pandey, resident of village - Manipur, P.S. Nokha, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant had paid Rs.3,70,000/- to the petitioner to get back-door entry in the college. Submission of the petitioner is that though the son of the informant was admitted at Kalinga University and not at the place initially proposed, hence, after admission, just to pressurize, false case has been lodged. He further submits that as the informant himself indulged in illegal act of getting back-door admission in colleges, he cannot be protected under the law. Considering the facts and circumstances of this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16392 of 2017 (3) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad (Bihar)/successor Court in connection with Aurangabad (Mufassil) Police Station Case No. 253 of 2015, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T