Mithlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40968 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2023 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== MITHLESH KUMAR, Son of Arjun Chaudhary @ Arjun Chaudhari, Resident of village - Shivratipur, P.S. - Dobhi, Distt. - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manisha Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 282 of 2023 dated 17.03.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 414, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was apprehended with stolen motorcycle by the police. It is further alleged that the petitioner could not produce any valid document regarding the seized motorcycle but a false insurance paper was produced which could not match with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40968 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 engine and chasis of the seized vehicle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2023.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail petition of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 282 of 2023.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T