Ahilya Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38689 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-936 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Ahilya Devi Wife of Arun Mandal Resident of Village- Mahouta (Bidu Vishanpur), P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case No.936 of 2025,FIR dated 25.12.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS.
3. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that she assaulted the blind son of informant by lathi which caused grievous injury on his left hand.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38689 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 any offence as alleged in the FIR and petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner and other co-accused persons have assaulted to the son of the informant, who is blind, and he has received the injury and injury inflicted upon the injured person (blind son of the informant) is grievous in nature and co-accused person, namely, Arun Mandal, who has assaulted alongwith the petitioner, has been has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22794 of 2026.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Amarpur P.S.Case No.936 of 2025 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka or Successor Court.
7. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T