Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13977/2017bail granted

Md. Neyaz Rayeen v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13977 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2016 Thana -PUPRI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Md. Neyaz Rayeen, son of Md. Nasir, resident of Village-Pupri, Ward No.7, Police Station-Pupri, District-Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Pupri P.S.Case No. 171 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others assaulted the deceased causing his death. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner and there is general and omnibus allegation against eight accused persons and petitioner is in custody since 4.11.2016. Heard learned APP also, who could not controvert the above submission.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13977 of 2017 (3) dt.01-05-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Pupri P.S.Case No. 171 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U