Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17014 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2016 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Singh, S/o Saryu Yadav, resident of VillageAlampur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 365, 506, 323, 341, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 13, 17 and 20 of U.A.P. Act.

Allegedly, call was made from mobile no. 7765977299 for ransom and the caller said his name as Rakesh Mishra. The informant refused to pay the said demand then his tractor driver Dharmendra Paswan was caught by 10-15 miscreants and was taken away to forest and when the partner called to meet him at the site then the driver was released.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. His name

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17014 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 has come in the confessional statement of Vijay Rajbhar and Shivmurat Rajbhar. The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2016. He has not been put on TIP. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and, as such, now he deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that besides confessional statement, there is no other material against the petitioner and, as such he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T