Jai Prakash Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18058 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2009 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Jai Prakash Ram, son of Bhola Ram, resident of Village- Kahardih, Police Station- Sono, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Indu Bala Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 22 of 2009, registered for offences punishable under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R, later on his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation. It has also been submitted that allegation that CDR location of the petitioner shows that he was talking to victim at the of occurrence and except that there is nothing against the petitioner and he has been in judicial custody since 09.02.2017 and now charge sheet has also been filed. It has further been submitted that though he has been named in three other cases, however, he has been made accused in all those cases only on the basis of suspicion or confessional statement.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18058 of 2017 (3) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 22 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T