Sri Bhagwan Choudhary v. The Accountanat General And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6707 of 2011 ====================================================== Sri Bhagwan Choudhary, Son of Late Nathun Choudhary, Resident of Village- Naubatpur, P.O. and P.S. Naubatpur, District- Patna, Presently residing at Satyendra Apartment, Flat No. 202, Maurya Path, Bailey Road near Jai Marble Khajpura, P.O. Veterinary College, P.S. Shastrinagar, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Accountant General, Bihar, R- Block, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.
2. The Senior Accounts Officer in the office of the Accountant General, Jharkhand at Ranchi.
3. The State of Jharkhand at Ranchi through the Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Cane Development.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Cane Development, Jharkhand at Ranchi.
5. The Director, Agriculture, Govt. of Jharkhand at Ranchi.
6. The Assistant Agriculture Director-cum-Deputy Controller, Weights and Measures, Hazaribagh.
7. Mir Kasim Ansari, Son of name not known, presently posted as Assistant Director Agriculture-cum-Deputy Controller, Weights and Measures, Hazaribagh.
8. The State of Bihar
9. The District Treasury Officer, Patna Collectorate, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 6.
08.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It appears that the admitted dues of the post retiral benefits of the petitioner have been paid though as per the petitioner, the deductions were made under the head of Group Insurance at the rate of Rs. 120/- per month but only Rs. 60/- has been computed while making payment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation has
Patna High Court CWJC No.6707 of 2011 (6) dt.08-01-2015 2/2 already been filed bringing to the notice of the authority concerned the discrepancy along with MACP (third ACP) benefit and transfer and packing allowance.
Though, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner having retired in the year 2010 while under employment of the State of Jharkhand, the writ application is not maintainable before this Court, however, in view of payments being made pursuant to filing of the writ application and the petitioner having filed his representation, which has been brought on record, before the authority concerned, as has been submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Jharkhand, the said authority shall dispose off such representation within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner has any further grievance, he shall be at liberty to move before the appropriate forum.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U