Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38076 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

Rajendra Yadav S/o Late Barish Lal Yadav R/o Village- Makuna ward No 10, PS- Bihra, District- Saharsa 2.

Ranju Devi W/o Ajit Kumar R/o Village- Makuna ward No 10, PS- Bihra, District- Saharsa 3.

Ajit Kumar S/o Rajendra Yadav R/o Village- Makuna ward No 10, PSBihra, District- Saharsa 4.

Fulo Devi @ Fuleshwari Devi W/o Rajendra Yadav R/o Village- Makuna ward No 10, PS- Bihra, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Bihra PS. Case No.- 30 of 2024 dated 14.02.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(k), 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, altercation took place between the informant and the petitioners' side on account of one goat grazing some grains of the informant, in which both sides got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38076 of 2025(3) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 injuries and case and counter case have been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that injury caused by the accused persons including the petitioners is simple in nature and case and counter case have been filed between both the parties.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioners for bail.

8. Considering the fact that both sides got injuries and case and counter case have been filed, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court below, in connection with Bihra PS. Case No.-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38076 of 2025(3) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 30 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions: (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T