Rajiv Kumar @ Pintu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32080 of 2016 (3) dt.17-09-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32080 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2016 Thana -BRAHMPURA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Rajiv Kumar @ Pintu son of Late Bindeshwar Mahto resident of VillageMagardhi, Ward No.15, P.S. Town Samastipur, District- Samastipur. at present House of Jaleshwar Sah Sada Godaun, Brahampura, P.S. Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Brahampura P.S. Case No. 57 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3⁄4 of Explosive Substance Act. Allegedly, in the rented room of the petitioner bomb was exploded and one person became injured who stated his name as Ramesh Kumar Srivastava and the petitioner succeeded in fleeing away.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence, he has voluntarily surrendered on 19.03.2016 and since then he is in custody, chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32080 of 2016 (3) dt.17-09-2016 Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner and further chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahampura P.S. Case No. 57 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T