Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6502/2017bail granted

Raj Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-10Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6502 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6502 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -MASRAKH District- SARAN ====================================================== Raj Kumar Manjhi, son of Munshi Manjhi, r/o. vill. Ghoghian, P.S. Masrakh,Dist. Saran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2017 in connection with Masrakh P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and as a matter of fact 20 litres of spirit kept in a black plastic gallon and 27 polythene containing 200 grams each of country made liquor has not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6502 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 of learned A.C.J.M. VIII, Saran in connection with Masrakh P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii)That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T