← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33550/2016disposed

Raj Kishore Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-05Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33550 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2012 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Raj Kishore Dubey S/o Late Vishwanath Dubey, R/o village Bishunpur Haril, P.S. Baruraj, Dist. Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Satyendra Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 05-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is the third attempt of the petitioner to seek bail in connection with Baruraj P.S. case no. 27 of 2012, registered under Sections 302/34 of the IPC wherein the allegation is that the petitioner inflicted 'Bhujali' blow on the father of the petitioner and killed. In the second attempt for grant of bail before this Court an order was passed on 07.10.2015 (Annexure-1/A). The Court while rejecting the prayer for bail observed if the prosecution fails to examine all prosecution witnesses within 07 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, he shall have liberty to renew prayer for bail. In the light of the said liberty the present application for bail. It is submitted that in spite of the said observation,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33550 of 2016 (4) dt.05-10-2016 2/3 the trial Court has not examined all prosecution witnesses. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 01.12.2013. A status report called for from the Trial Court is placed at Flag- 'X' . From perusal whereof, it appears that upon transfer of the case from the Court of learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge 10 out of 13 witnesses have been examined on behalf of the prosecution. Only 03 witnesses remained to be examined.

Balancing the fundamental right of a citizen as well as the right of the society, this Court would dispose of the application while declining the prayer for bail by the following order:- Let the trial Court take steps and examine the remaining prosecution witness within 04 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Court, failing which the trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 27/12, Sessions Trial No. 444/2014 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33550 of 2016 (4) dt.05-10-2016 3/3 (ii) In the event of grant of bail, the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial Court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T