Mantu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37831 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- AAYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== MANTU SINGH, aged about 32 (Male), S/o Late Suresh Singh, R/o villageDhamapakar, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj. At present C/o Subhag Ram, Village- Baligaon, P.S.- Ayer, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.03.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 08.03.2019 at about 3.30 A.M. on secret information that the son-in-law of Subhag Ram does business of illegal arms and he has come at Baligaon with illegal arms. On this information, the informant and others surrounded the house of Subhag Ram and the persons who were opening the door, was attempted to flee away after seeing the police force but he was arrested by the police and on asking, he told his name as Mantu Singh (petitioner). On search
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37831 of 2019(2) dt.21-06-2019 2/2 of his body, one country made Katta from his Pant was recovered.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. One country made pistol is alleged to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr. P.C.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- VII, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with G.R. Case No. 887 of 2019, arising out of Ayar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T