Dharmendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35777 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2015 Thana -PUPRI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Dharmendra Kumar Son of Dotick Sah, resident of Village- Godha, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Mithilesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 150 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 414/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and section 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act .
The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 49784 of 2015 and this Court, vide order dated 06.11.2015, rejected the same with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one year of jail custody. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2015.
In view of the observation, let the petitioner,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35777 of 2016 (3) dt.28-09-2016 2/2 Dharmendra Kumar, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 150 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below.
In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to Pupri Police Station by 7th of every month at least for six months and in case of failure without any valid rhyme or reason, the bail of the petitioner will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T