Deepu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49599 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2020 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Deepu Kumar S/O Late Devendra Kumar Chaudhary R/O Village And P.OChakand Bazar, P.S-Chakand, District-Gaya (BIHAR). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-06-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364(A), 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner along with other are said to have kidnapped the son of the informant, driver and three villagers and boarded them in Scorpio and fled away.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that earlier petitioner filed a complaint against SDM, SDPO and SHO, Hathua in the Office of Additional Mission Director, Bihar Administrative Reforms

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49599 of 2021(3) dt.21-06-2022 2/2 Mission Society, Patna and due to this annoyance, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this. He submits that there is no material in the case diary to show his involvement in the present case and only on the basis of suspicion, he has been made accused. He further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 145 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T