Paras Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6678 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2016 Thana -BACHWARA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Paras Mahto, son of Sukhdeo Mahto, Resident of Village- Ajanaul, Police Station- Dalsing Sarai, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 07-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.726 of 2016, arising out of Bachhwara P.S. Case No.127 of 2016, registered under Sections 363 and 365/34 and, later on, added Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case in the confessional statement of the co-accused Manish Kumar. Except that, there is nothing against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2016. Further submission is that while the petitioner is accused in two other cases, as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6678 of 2017 (4) dt.07-04-2017 2/2 detailed in paragraph-3 to this application, but the petitioner is on bail in that cases.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Begusarai, in connection with Sessions Trial No.726 of 2016, arising out of Bachhwara P.S. Case No.127 of 2016. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T