← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10030/2024disposed

Tara Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10030 of 2024 ====================================================== Tara Sinha Wife of- Late Vidya SagarChoudhary, R/o PragyaBhawan, Nalanda Colony, Khajpura, PS- Rajiv Nagar, PO- B.V College, Patna- 800014 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

Director District Health Department Society Patna. 4.

Civil Surgeon Health department, Government of Bihar. 5.

A.D.M Disaster Management Patna.

6.

Director, Rainbow Emergency Hospital, S.P Varma Road, Patna- 800001 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.(i) For issuance of appropriate writ, order, direction to the respondent authorities to dispose off application of the petitioner by which the petitioner claims ex-gratia amount/compensation from the respondent, for the Covid-19 death of the husband of petitioner.

(ii) For direction to the respondent authorities to pay Covid-19 death relief fund to the petitioner as prescribed by the Government of Bihar."

2.

The simple prayer of the petitioner is to

Patna High Court CWJC No.10030 of 2024(3) dt.29-08-2024 2/2 make payment of the ex gratia amount on account of death of her husband due to COVID-19 infection. 3.

In order to address the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent-State seeks to file a supplementary counter affidavit, copy whereof has already been filed online. Let the same be kept on record. 4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent-State that a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/- has already been paid to the petitioner, hence nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the aforesaid amount has not been paid to the petitioner, the petitioner be granted liberty to mention the case. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

6.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U