Chandu Bhuiayan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34888 of 2016 (2) dt.31-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34888 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2013 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Chandu Bhuiayan Son of Late Takuri Bhuian Resident of villageJhankpur Raniganj, P.S.- Imamganj, Distict- Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 15.10.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27838 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2013. The informant is not the eye witness, as a matter of fact there was some quarrel between the informant and his wife and then she committed suicide and due to enmity the informant implicated the petitioner to which learned APP seriously opposes by submitting that the witness Vijay Sao has seen the petitioner killing the deceased.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34888 of 2016 (2) dt.31-08-2016 However, the learned C.J.M./Magistrate is directed to commit the case at once and after commitment learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months after keeping the same on day to day basis.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T