Ram Prasad Raunak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44653 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1170 Year-2022 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

RAM PRASAD RAUNAK Son of Late Ram Avtar Raunak Resident of village and Post - Singhaul, P.S. - Belaganj and Distt. - Gaya 2.

Parvati Devi Wife of Ram Prasad Raunak Resident of village and Post - Singhaul, P.S. - Belaganj and Distt. - Gaya 3.

Rupesh Raunak Son of Ram Prasad Raunak Resident of village and Post - Singhaul, P.S. - Belaganj and Distt. - Gaya 4.

Navin Raunak Son of Ram Prasad Raunak Resident of village and Post - Singhaul, P.S. - Belaganj and Distt. - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rita Kumari Wife of Dipesh Raunak, D/o Shyam Prasad Singh Resident of village and Post - Singhaul, P.S. - Belaganj and Distt. - Gaya. At present C/o Munna Singh, resident of village - Shivganj Tola, Post - Dawan, P.S. - Bihiya and Distt. - Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No.2, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 323, 341, 498(A) and 506 of the IPC and sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have physically and mentally tortured the complainant for demand of dowry.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44653 of 2023(2) dt.10-08-2023 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. Petitioners have neither made any dowry demand nor have tortured the complainant. Petitioners are the in-laws family members of O.P. No.2 and there is no specific overt act against them. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific overt act against the petitioners named above, let them, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.1170(C) of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T