Sachin Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37184 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2018 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== SACHIN RAI S/o Laxman Rai R/o village- Shankar Harpur, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Parsa P. S. Case No 198 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399/ 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the typed copy of FIR at Fardbeyan annexed with bail petition.

It is alleged that one country made pistol and live cartridge have been recovered from possession of petitioner. The other co-accused of this case has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 75469 of 2018.

Petitioner is in custody since 30.9.2018 having no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37184 of 2019(2) dt.24-06-2019 2/2 criminal antecedent.

Keeping in view the clean antecedent of petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJMXIII, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Parsa P. S. Case No 198 of 2018 subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T