Ajit Ram @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44258 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Ajit Ram @ Ajit Kumar S/o Munna @ Munna Ram @ Ajay Ram Resident of Village- Near Nisha Mandir, Purvi Lohanipur Ambedkar Colony, Kadamkuan, P.S- Kadamkuan ,District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 14.03.2025, some unknown miscreants entered in the house of the informant and took away various gold articles, silver and cash from different house of the same building. On the basis of CCTV footage, one Chotu Kumar was identified and he has given his confessional statement. The name of this petitioner has surfaced
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44258 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/3 in the confessional statement of Chotu Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the seizure list it will transpire that certain recoveries has been made from the other co-accused persons but nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail relying on the order of the trial court that the trial court has observed that recovery has been made from the possession of this petitioner as well.
6. I have perused the seizure list. From perusal of the seizure list it is clear that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44258 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T