Laxmi Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2556 of 2011 ====================================================== Laxmi Pathak son of late Sidheshwar Pathak, resident of village Surhari, Police Station Mufassil, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary (Secondary Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Bihar, Patna

2. The Special Director, (Secondary Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, through its Chairman, Boring Canal Road, Patna

4. The District Education Officer, Jehanabad

5. The then Managing Committee of Laxmi Sangved Sanskrit High School Jehanabad, Police Station and District Jehanabad, through its Secretary

6. The present Managing Committee of Laxmi Sangved Sanskrit High School, Jehanabad, Police Station and District Jehanabad through its Secretary

7. The Headmaster, Laxmi Saangved Sanskrit High School, Jehanabad

8. Upendra Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of village Ganeyari, Dist. Arwal, at present posted as the Headmas in Laxami Sangved Sanskrit High School, Jehanabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mrs. M Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr. Rajan, AC to GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 In the present writ application, the petitioner has challenged the appointment of the Respondent No.7 on the post of Headmaster in a School in question.

It has been pointed out that the petitioner has already been superannuated from his service on 31.07.2017. Taking into that account, no substantive relief can be granted to the petitioner as the present writ application has become

Patna High Court CWJC No.2556 of 2011 (5) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 infructuous.

Considering the aforesaid facts and the circumstances, the present writ application is dismissed as being infructuous.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U