Kaushar Miyan @ Kausar Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40441 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- DHANGAI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
KAUSHAR MIYAN @ KAUSAR ALAM Son of Md. Serajuddin Resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 6, Gajragarh, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya. 2.
Kaisar Miyan @ Kaisar Alam Son of Md. Serajuddin Resident of MohallaWard No. 6, Gajragarh, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya. 3.
Md. Serajuddin @ Serajuddin Miyan @ Charku Miya Son of Md. Mustaque Alam @ Chand Khan Resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 6, Gajragarh, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Jubair Ansari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard both sides.
The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No.13 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15/18(c)/25 of the NDPS Act.
The petitioners are said to have engaged in illegal cultivation of opium.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have got criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40441 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 submitted that no specific overt act is alleged against the petitioners.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Taking into consideration the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T