Pramod Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36922 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2020 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== PRAMOD SAHANI S/o Jyoti Sahani Resident of Village-Dhanwat, P.SSaraiya, O.P.-Jaintpur, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs.Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2020 in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 290 of 2020 (G.R.No.1460 of 2020) for the alleged offences under Sections 25(I-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of a country-made katta, a live cartridge and a small Samsung mobile. It is submitted that in any event the petitioner has already suffered custody for more
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36922 of 2020(2) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 than eight months.
4. Learned APP appears and submits that the petitioner is accused in four prior cases, albeit of different nature.
5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 13.05.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 290 of 2020 (G.R.No.1460 of 2020), if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T