← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17464/2015disposed

Sandeep Rai And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-22Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17464 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2015 Thana -GARKHA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Sandeep Rai Son of Ram Kishun Rai,

2. Ram Kishun Rai, Son of Late Arati Rai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-05-2015 The application with regard to petitioner no.2 has already been disposed of since he was arrested. Petitioner no.1 is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 32, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that co-accused Urmila Devi and Ritu Kumari pulled down the wife of the informant by catching her hair and legs, thereafter petitioner no.2, Ram Kishun Rai assaulted with farsa on her head and when the informant came to rescue, he was also assaulted by sword by petitioner no.1, consequently Ram Kishun Rai also assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the only one lacerated injury simple in nature caused by hard and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17464 of 2015 (3) dt.22-05-2015 2/2 blunt substance has been found on the scalp of the wife of the informant whereas informant received three injuries out of which two injuries are lacerated and one injury has been found to be caused by sharp cutting weapon when it is alleged that two persons caused injury with sharp cutting weapon. There is counter version of the occurrence also and the petitioners' side also received injury.

The aforesaid facts constitute good ground for consideration of prayer for regular bail.

Let the learned court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner no.1 if he surrenders within a period of six weeks in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 19 of 2015 pending in the court of learned CJM, Saran at Chapra. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T