Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38304 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Manu Pandey @ Mannu Pandey Resident of VillageRulahi, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025 dated 28.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61 of the B.N.S. and Sections 66C, 66D, 66F of I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that one mobile phone, Rs. 25,000/- cash and ATM Card were recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Anubhaw Kumar. It is further alleged that the i-20 Car was also recovered and on search of the said car, ATM Cards of different Banks, mobile phones, SIM Cards and total Rs. 1,63,000/- were recovered.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38304 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 Further, 40,000/-, one mobile phone and two ATM Cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 07.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38473/2025. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38304 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T