← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1266/2025dismissed

Manaturani Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Sec. Home Deptt. Govt. Of Bihar , Patna

2025-08-05Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1266 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manaturani Devi Wife of Naga Sahani R/o Vill- Belapar Dhekha Bazar , P.S - Pipra ,District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The state of Bihar through the Principal Sec. Home Deptt. Govt. of Bihar , Patna Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Patna , Bihar Bihar 3.

The Deputy Inspector General Of Police ,Bettiah, West Champaran Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Motiharim, East Champaran Bihar 5.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chakiya, Motihari,East Champaran Bihar 6.

The Station House Officer , Pipra Kothi, Motihari, East Champaran Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. K.P. Gupta, G.P.10 Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. This writ petition has been filed for directing the Respondent No. 4 i.e., Superintendent of Police, Motihari and the Respondent No. 6 i.e., SHO of Pipra Kothi Police Station for lodging the FIR against the accused persons.

3. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted this fact that the deceased had died in Bengaluru and post-mortem was conducted in Bengaluru.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1266 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2

4. In my opinion, no offence has been committed in the State of Bihar therefore, no FIR can be registered in this State.

5. The petitioner wants registration of an FIR by suppressing the actual fact as to what happened with the petitioner's son in Bengaluru.

6. In view of the discussions made above, this application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U