← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36420/2020bail granted

Chandan Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-27Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36420 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2020 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR DAS S/o Late Ram Sharan Das Resident of VillageMalkana, P.O.- Bajitpur, P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Kanchan Kumari D/o Shree Suresh Das Resident of Village- Dev Ram (Amathi) P.S.- Bahera, Distt- Darbhanga.

3.

Suresh Das Son of Kul Kul Das Resident of Village- Dev Ram (Amathi), P.S.- Bahera, Distt- Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Shahnawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant through video conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 144/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/149/341/323/376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant Suresh Das has informed that both the parties have settled the differences as the boy and girl have married and there are living together.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36420 of 2020(5) dt.27-01-2022 2/2 It has also come during the investigation that the girl was a major at the date of occurrence.

Considering the above, the prosecution of all the accused (in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 144/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/149/341/323/376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act) in this case is quashed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/-Anand Kr.

U T