Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43544/2016bail granted

Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43544 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2016 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav S/o Late Nagmani Singh R/o vill. - Nonhar, P.S. Suryapura, Distt. Rohtas .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandrashekhar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2016 in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 87 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and the F.I.R. is against unknown. No recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Co-accused Raushan Kumar @ Dimpal from whose possession the recovery of the stolen motorcycle is said to have been made, has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 31670 of 2016.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 87 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43544 of 2016 (2) dt.22-10-2016 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T