Patna High CourtCWJC/78/2015disposed

Rubi Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-23Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 78 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Rubi Kumari, W/o Sanjay Kumar R/o Village- Rajwara Birla, P.O.- Musharniya East, P.S.- Sonbarsa District- Sitamarhi.

2. Ajay Kumar S/o Bhikhari Rai, R/o Village- Hari Bella Via- Bhutahi, P.O.- HariBella, P.S- Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary Education Department, Bihar Patna.

2. The Director (Primary Education), Education Department Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4. The District, Education Officer Sitamarhi.

5. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Samastipur.

6. The Block Development Officer, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

7. The Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

8. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Purandaha, Rajwara East Block Sonbarsa District- Sitamarhi.

9. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Purandaha Rajwara East Block Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State.

2. It transpires that the matter relates to the dispute raised by the petitioners with regard to non payment of their salaries for the period they have worked from October, 2013 to 09.07.2015.

3. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Sitamarhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Authority') has been created for

Patna High Court CWJC No.78 of 2015 (6) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 the purposes of looking into such dispute which would necessarily involve facts and verification of records.

4. Having considered the aforesaid, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioners should move before the Authority in the matter. If the same is done within four weeks from today, the Authority shall consider and dispose off the appeal on merits expeditiously and within the statutory period.

5. The writ petition stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U