Bishnu Harijan @ Bishnu Das @ Harijan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50364 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Bishnu Harijan @ Bishnu Das @ Harijan son of Late Bahaddo Harijan @ Bhaddo Das resident of Village - Chhoti Naki, P.S. - Sanokhar, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected by order dated 19.05.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 14840 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.01.2016, he was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the victim girl during trial and the victim girl has already been examined and now there is no chance of tampering with prosecution evidence and in near future, the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. in the light of observation made in earlier order does not oppose the prayer of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50364 of 2016 (2) dt.30-11-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bhagalpur in connection with S. T. No. 257 of 2016, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No.13 of 2015 (G.R. No. 681 of 2015), subject to conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Amit/- U T