Guddu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42554 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Guddu Ansari Son of Aashik Ansari R/O Vill.- Bariyarpur, P.S.- Pachrukhi, Dist.- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State f Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandra Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024 dated 06.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 414 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 05.04.2024 the informant was on patrolling duty, in the meantime, they saw two miscreants riding on a motorcycle without number plate, who started fleeing away on seeing the police vehicle and they were caught. On being inquired one disclosed his name as Guddu Ansari (petitioner) and during search a black colored without
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42554 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 2/3 number plate Splendor Motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Further it is alleged that the petitioner was failed to submit the document related to the seized article.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that police has recovered the motorcycle from Gamhariya Market which is busy place but there is no any independent witness made by police. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42554 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan, in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T