Nandlal Mahto And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16274 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2015 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Nandlal Mahto, son of late Jangali Mahto

2. Churkaran Mahto @ Chunchun Mahto, S/o Nandlal Mahto

3. Rampari Devi, wife of Nandlal Mahto

4. Pinki Devi, wife of Chunchun Mahto @ Churkaran Mahto All resident of village- Ghosbar, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali

5. Ranju Devi wife of Satyendra Singh, resident of village- Desri, P.O. Desri, P.S. Desari, District- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kishor, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Haque, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 28-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioners are in-laws of the deceased and claim to have been living separately and there is no direct material against them, let the Petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 09 of 2015, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16274 of 2015 (2) dt.28-05-2015 2/2 bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T