← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5078/2017bail granted

Vikram Paswan @ Vikram Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5078 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2015 Thana -KHODABANDPUR District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Vikram Paswan @ Vikram Kumar Paswan, Son of Janardan Paswan, Resident of Village- Katausi, P.s.- Bithan, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Khodabandpur P.S.Case No.37 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is informant of the case but later on he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion, except that there is no overt act against him and he is in custody since 17.09.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no overt act against the petitioner and not controverted by the learned A.P.P., let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5078 of 2017 (3) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Manjhaul, Begusarai in connection with Khodabandpur P.S.Case No.37 of 2015.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U