Imtiyaz Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42760 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Imtiyaz Ansari, S/o- Md. Ekbal Ansari, Village- Duari Ps- Karakat Dist.- Rohtas 2.

Nukul Ansari @ Md. Nurul @ Chhotan, son Md. Ahmad Ansari VillageDuari Ps- Karakat Dist.- Rohtas 3.

Azad Ansari, son of Jibrail Ansari, Village- Duari Ps- Karakat Dist.- Rohtas 4.

Jibrail Ansari @ Jibrail Ishak Ansari, son of Late Ishak Ansari, VillageDuari Ps- Karakat Dist.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 199 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 448, 506, 354, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the informant and his family members by abusing and outraging the modesty of female inmates.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties. On the date of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42760 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 occurrence, an altercation took place between the parties in which both the parties have got injuries including grievous in nature. There is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioners. In fact there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are ready to cooperate in the investigation and trial of this case.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 199 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T