← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39377/2025bail granted

Niranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-26Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39377 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2024 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Niranjan Kumar S/o Sashi Bhushan Anand R/o Village- Kunauli, P.S.- Kunauli, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.. 3.

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that 3-4 unknown persons intercepted the motorcycle of the informant and on the point of gun snatched a mobile phone, two SIM card and cash Rs. 13,000/- and also snatched his motorcycle. They also assaulted the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39377 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 2/3 The petitioner was neither apprehended on spot nor anything incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name has transpired in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Nitish Kumar who has already been granted bail by this Court. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the present anticipatory bail application. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the co-accused Nitish Kumar has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48053 of 2024.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39377 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 3/3 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T