Ram Khelawan Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7125 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2014 Thana -NIMCHAKBATHANI District- GAYA ====================================================== Ram Khelawan Bind, son of Sri Degan Bind, resident of Village- Narauni Bala Bigha, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S.Case No. 36 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is omnibus allegation against the petitioner and the case has been lodged under Section 302 IPC on the death of sister of the informant and petitioner is Debar and has remained in custody for seven months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for seven months, who is Debar, and other accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc. No. 35138 of 2014 in Cr.Misc. No. 40091 of 2015 vide orders dated 20.1.2015 and 21.12.2015 respectively, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7125 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 10th , Gaya, in connection with Neemchak Bathani No. 36 of 2014, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U