Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10218/2017bail granted

Ramun Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10218 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHESI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ramun Ram S/o Late Dhanpat Ram Resident of Village- Bhimalpur, P.S. Mehsi, District East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Trial No. 2550 of 2016, arising out of Mehsi P.S.Case No. 100 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 290/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 47(a) of Bihar Excise Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is alleged recovery of 23 litres of country made liquor and petitioner is in custody for about seven months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for seven months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10218 of 2017 (2) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Trial No. 2550 of 2016, arising out of Mehsi P.S.Case No. 100 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U