Gorelal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7156 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2015 Thana -SIKANDARA District- JAMUI ====================================================== Gorelal Mahto son of late Sita Ram Mahto, resident of Village-Kurhadih, P.S. Sikandra, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Sikandra P.S.Case No.159 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is accused in two other cases also but so far this case is concerned, except the confessional statement before the Police, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for about three months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the aforesaid fact Having heard both sides and in view of the above fact as well as the fact that the petitioner is in custody for about three months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7156 of 2017 (3) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. 2nd, Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S.Case of 159 of 2015. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U