Nagendra Mahto @ Nagendra Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7123 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGWANPUR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Nagendra Mahto @ Nagendra Kumar Mahto, son of Ram Kishun Mahto, resident of Village- Daulatpur, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ma. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No. 181 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused the petitioner has been implicated in this case and has remained in custody for four months and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused, coupled with the fact that he has remained in custody for four months, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7123 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Vaishali, in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No. 181 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U