Gaurav Tanti @ Gaurav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38307 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Gaurav Tanti @ Gaurav S/o Billat Tanti @ Bullet Tanti R/o Village- Bathauli, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025 dated 25.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 115(2), 126(2), 109, 324(4), 329(4), 303(2), 352, 351(2) read with section 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons armed with various weapons abused the informant and the petitioner assaulted Raju Tanti on his head with Khanti with intention to kill and Chandan Tanti also assaulted him with lathi causing injury. When the informant went to rescue, they also assaulted him with lathi and Danda. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38307 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 2/3 is further alleged that they entered the informant's house and committed Marpit with the informant's wife and looted Rs. 10,000/- cash, mobile phone, and Jhumka worth Rs. 35,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is a delay of four days in lodging the FIR. The allegation of assaulting the injured is against the petitioner and the co-accused person. There is no repetition of blow. The petitioner has no intention to cause death on the informant hence no case is made out under section 109 of the BNS against the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the injury is stated to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38307 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 3/3 concerned, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025, with a condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T