Ranjeet Kumar @ Matiya @ Matima v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9682 of 2017 (2) dt.15-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9682 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2016 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Matiya @ Matima, S/o Rajan Sahni, R/o Sadikpur, Mangru Akhara, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016, registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but in course of investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused, Suraj Kumar @ Prahalad as detailed in paragraph 43 of the case diary. It is further submitted that while petitioner is accused in one another case, but in that case, he is on bail and in the present case, he is in custody since 09.09.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9682 of 2017 (2) dt.15-03-2017 the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Patna, in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T