Tuttu @ Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41196 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2025 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Tuttu @ Sanjeet Kumar Son of - Ravindra Singh Resident of MohallaHiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna 2.
Shashi Kumar Son of Vishwanath Singh Resident of Mohalla- Hiranandpur, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv.
For the Informant :
Mr. Sujeet Kr. Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Chandra Shekhar Anand, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 385 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act.
3. As per FIR, during occurrence co-accused Ravi Kumar ordered co-accused Rahul Kumar to fire upon the brother of the informant hitting to his chest as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41196 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 a result of which, he fell down and got unconscious. It is alleged that these petitioners torn blouse and saree of the ladies during the occurrence.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners were implicated with present crime in question only being brother of the co-accused namely, Rahul Kumar who specifically alleged to fire upon the brother of the informant during the occurrence. It is pointed out that the allegation to torn blouse is not appears to be raised that same was town with sexual intent, and therefore, allegation of outraging modesty not appears attracting. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that petitioners found involved in one more case where they are on bail.
5. Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant while opposing the prayer of bail could not disputed aforesaid submission.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41196 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 by taking note of fact as the occurrence of firing is not available against these petitioners rather they appears prima-facie implicated for outraging the modesty of the ladies during the occurrence prima-facie without any allegation of sexual intent, accordingly both abovenamed petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Patna City/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 385 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Sudha/- U T