Haidar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38751 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Haidar Ansari Son of Shakil Ansari Resident of Village- Aropur, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jugnu Pravin Daughter of Late Sultan Ansari Resident of Village- Aropur, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr Mantu Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 654 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 85, 79, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of establishing physical relationship with the victim on the pretext of marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38751 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 2/3 the victim were acquainted with each other for a considerable period and were engaged in a voluntary and consensual relationship. It is contended that the materials collected during investigation indicate that the physical relationship between the parties was consensual and continued over a period of time. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, the nature of allegations and the materials available on record, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 654 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38751 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026 3/3 adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T