Jay Narayan Das v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Deptt. ,Bihar Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1226 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Jay Narayan Das Son of Late Kishun Das R/o vill - Itaaun , P.S- Chanan, Distt.- Lakhisarai, At Present Posted as Headmaster of Upgraded Middle School Pacham Chanan, Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Police Deptt. ,Bihar Patna Bihar 2.
The additional Chief Secretary, Education Deptt. Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.
The Director Primary Education Deptt. , Bihar, Patna Bihar 4.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education Munger ,Distt- Munger Bihar 5.
The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai Bihar 6.
The Superintending of Police, Lakhisarai Bihar 7.
The Sub Divisional Police Officer ,Lakhisarai Bihar 8.
The District Education Officer , Lakhisarai. Bihar 9.
The District Programme Officer , Planning and Accounts , Lakhisarai Bihar 10.
The Executive Engineer ,Samagra Shiksha , Lakhisarai Bihar 11.
The Junior Engineer , Samagra Shiksha, Lakhisarai Bihar 12.
The Block Education Officer Chanan, Distt- Lakhisarai Bihar 13.
The S.H.O Adarsh , P.S Lakhisarai Bihar 14.
The Investigating Officer ,Lakhisarai, P.S Case NO. 193/2025 Bihar 15.
Aman Traders (Vendor), Naya Bazar, Lakhisarai Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Arvind Ujjawal, S.C. 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. This application has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. i.e. Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.193 of 2025 registered for the
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1226 of 2025(2) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 316(5), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The petitioner wants quashing of the F.I.R. on the basis of his defence, which cannot be considered for quashing the F.I.R. against an accused.
4. In these circumstances, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds at an appropriate stage, if charge-sheet is filed against him.
5. The petitioner is permitted to approach the concerned Court below for redressal of his grievances by way of filing a petition in his case in light of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P., reported as (2008) 2 SCC 409.
6. If such a petition is filed then the same shall be considered by the Court below in accordance with law and appropriate orders shall be passed.
7. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) anand/- U T