Anil Chandravanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5755 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2013 Thana -PAUTHU District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Anil Chandravanshi, son of Late Khelawan Chandravanshi, resident of Village-Khaira Mohan, P.S.-Goh, District-Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Pouthu P.S.Case No. 20 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 435 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act including Section 17 CLA Act & 10 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner except confessional statement of co-accused. Though petitioner is involved in two other cases but he is on bail in the said cases and he is in custody for about two months.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that other co-accused have been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 5570 of 2017, Cr.Misc.No.11733 of 2014 and in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5755 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 Cr.Misc.No. 9012 of 2016 and, as such, except confessional statement there is nothing against him, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Pouthu P.S.Case No. 20 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 892 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors should be either the Mukhiya or Surpanch or a public servant of the village within the jurisdiction of the court and another bailor should be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties without the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further he will make himself available in court on each and every date fixed and on failure on his part to appear in court on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled immediately.

With the above observations, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U