Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34567 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2014 Thana -KALER District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Satyendra Singh

2. Vikram Singh @ Vikrama Singh Both S/o Late Munarik Singh .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.344 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2014 Thana -KALER District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Arvind Kumar son of Late Tirpurari Singh .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.34567 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renu Kumari(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.344 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2015 Both the above stated petitions have arisen out of Kaler P.S. Case No. 36 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the

Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. There is accusation against the petitioners that they assaulted the injured.

No doubt, there is case and counter case between the parties and persons from both the sides sustained injury and furthermore, the parties have compromised the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as allegations levelled against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 36 of 2014 pending in the court of Shri Brajesh Mani Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jehanabad/concerned court stands rejected.

However, if petitioners surrender before the concerned court within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, the concerned court shall consider the regular bail application of the petitioners on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order, particularly, keeping

in mind the factum of case and counter case, compromise as well as nature of injuries sustained by injured of this case. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T