Shidheshwar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47929 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -304 Year- 2016 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Shidheshwar Ram Son of Late Bhagat Ram resident of Mohalla Chuna Bhattha Lalganj, P.S. Dehri (Town), District Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh & Mr. Brajesh Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No. 304 of 2016 for the offence under section 8/20 b(ii) (c )/25 of the N.D.P.S. Act pending in the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Sasaram. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation, as per the first information report, is that the police got a confidential information that the petitioner is engaged in the trade of Ganja and on that information the police raided the house of the petitioner but nothing was recovered from the possession or house of the petitioner. However, it is alleged that in search of a house situated in south in two plastic packets 3 1⁄2 Kg. of Ganja
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47929 of 2016 (3) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 and 23 sachet of one gram each was recovered. It is submitted that the petitioner is an old man and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in jail custody since 15.06.2016.
Heard learned A.P.P. also who has opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that three and a half Kg. of Ganja was recovered from the house of the petitioner and apart from that 23 sachets of one gram ganja each was also recovered from the house of the petitioner.
Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that large quantity of Ganja has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application for bail is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial who shall try to dispose of the case as soon as possible . (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amin/- U