Sudhanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.392 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2016 Thana -BATHNAHA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Sudhanshu Kumar, S/o Late Dashrath Mishra, R/o village - Parchhahiya, P.S. - Sonbarsa, District - Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 13.8.2016 in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 104 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been made accused on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Sadab Alam and he remained in custody for more than five months. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both side and after considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.392 of 2017 (2) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bathnaha P.S.Case No. 104 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U