Ravi Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14408 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2017 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Ravi Chaudhary Son of Megha Chaudhary @ Meghan Chaudhary resident of Village - Purani Shahar, near Devi Asthan Barbigha, P.S. - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura, At present resident of Nehaluchak (Nanihal) P.S. Nagar, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Nawada Town P.S.Case No.49 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

According to the petitioner, he has clean antecedent and he has remained in custody for more than 1 1⁄2 months and also allegedly there is recovery of 19 ltrs. of country-made liquor but not from the possession of the petitioner rather from the Tempo. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of the petitioner as well as the fact that he has remained in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14408 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 for about 1 1⁄2 months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S.Case No.49 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U